With a full season to bed here in North America, I’ve been taking some time to think about some different points of emphasis for 2010, particularly for our athletes who are looking to place better in their relative age groups. Place better could be a move from the Middle of the Pack(MOP) to Front of the Pack (FOP). It could even mean chasing a coveted slot for one of WTC’s championships. Lately, I’ve been thinking more and more about the swim and it’s “rebirth” in importance at the long distances - 70.3 and Ironman.
Looking at the depth of competition both at the professional and age group level, minutes are now deciding podium spots at the professional level and who gets a podium, Clearwater, Kona (insert accolade here) or not at the Age Group level. For example, the Kona men’s professional race for places 1-10 were separated by a mere 10 minutes! The quality of the field at all levels of triathlon is staggering. It’s a reflection of a sport that’s in a more mature stage of it’s lifecycle. There are more and more high-level athletes competing at the same time than ever before.
So why does the swim really matter now more than ever? The real short answer: the aforementioned depth of the field. For the answer behind the short one, well, that is a bit more complicated. Minutes mean everything at the top end of the field, obviously, but they also mean heart beats, too. Anybody who has observed Kona firsthand can tell you that at the professional level, the pros are squeezing every centimeter out of the 10m draft rule. If there’s a line, they’re either right on it or slightly fore or aft of that line in any given moment. If you’re a pro that doesn’t get out of the water with the top group, you end up doing a fair amount of chasing on the bike to get into the legal 10m train that forms with a lot of the elite pros. Chasing means extra heart beats on the bike which in turn means less heart beats for the run when you really need them in the end. If you listen to post-Kona interviews of Craig Alexander, Chris McCormack or Chrissy Wellington this year talking about their races, each one of them explicitly talks about the importance of their swim on the day. They also acknowledge how the swim is now being prioritized because of its critical role on the outcome of races. For Macca, he admits that having deprioritized his swim training this year may have cost him a second title. The chasing on the Queen K took a lot out of him and likely accelerated his electrolyte loss on the bike that ultimately felled his title hopes.
So how does the swim really affect the elite Age Group races? Going back to the quality of the competition, the depth of the age group ranks doesn’t allow you to have a really weak leg and still contend for a podium or slot at a top tier race. In some cases, athletes who have an incredibly strong bike coupled with a very strong run (or vise versa) can overcome a sub-par swim*. It depends on who shows up on that day, though. Unlike the pros who do a jig on the 10m line for the bike leg, the AG rank and file are often blatantly drafting. Drafting in the AG circuit is a subject for another occasions, but the swim doesn’t preclude you, either way, from drafting on the bike. In fact, a weaker swim allows you more of a draft effect, as more of your fellow athletes are out on the course during the bike. FOP swimmers don’t get the benefit of masses out on the bike course - drafting or not - so this can often be a Catch-22.
Where the swim really affects AGers is during the swim itself. If you have ever watched a full-to-the-gills IM swim (insert any IM North America race here), it looks like a rugby scrum…and not just at the start of the swim. If you’re coming out of the water in the 1:05-1:20 range at an IM, you have been “swimming” within 1 standard deviation either direction of the mean swim time for a long, long time. To call that effort “swimming” would be a half truth. It’s two-parts rugby/wrestling, one-part swimming. There are so many athletes in so little space, that the inevitable elbow, arm, hand, foot, leg to the body is going to happen, and likely more than once. Because we as athletes don’t practice that aspect of the swim often, if at all, it’s natural for our anxiety levels to elevate, and in some cases, sky rocket. Anxiety = elevated heart. Invariably, the swim for these athletes will cost several extra precious heart beats. It doesn’t matter if you’re vying for first overall, a shot at a slot or to finish under a 17 hour time cutoff, extra heart beats for the run means everything at the end of an IM or half. If you can avoid the masses out on the swim, swim in pretty clean water (though always find a draft!) and ultimately save some heart beats, that’s the path you want to take. Allocate those saved heart beats to the run where you will get the most bang for your effort.
As you evaluate your priorities for 2010, take an honest inventory of your strengths and weaknesses. Look at your 2010 goals in relation to these strengths and weaknesses and then develop a program to help maximize your performance. If the swim is a deficiency, get to work. There’s no more wiggle-room any more at the top of these races regardless of whether you’re a pro or AGer (unless you’re a sassy Brit whose last name is also a nice beef dish) . The sport is too mature and the quality of the field directly reflects the sport.
*For the sake of argument, I would say that a sub-par swim for an elite AGer is anything above 1:00 for an IM and 30 minutes for a half (conditions/course being reasonable). A really weak swim for an elite AGer is anything 1:08 and above or 32 minutes+ for a half (again, conditions and course being reasonable).



